For Authors
Submissions Open
Author Guidelines

Publish Your Research

We welcome original research, reviews, and short communications that advance knowledge across our scope areas. Please read these guidelines carefully before preparing your manuscript.

1-3Months Avg. Review Time
Free No APC / Submission Fee
Double Blind Peer Review
OA Open Access
"

Rigorous peer review, fast turnaround, and zero publication fees — our commitment to authors and science.

— Editorial Board
Scroll to explore
01
Step by Step

Submission Process

All manuscripts must be submitted through our online system.

01

Prepare Your Manuscript

Format your manuscript according to the Author Guidelines. Ensure all figures, tables, and supplementary files are prepared separately.

Before submission
Key Requirements
  • Anonymised main text (.docx or .tex)
  • Separate title page with ORCID IDs
  • Figures as high-res separate files (300 dpi+)
  • APA 7th Edition references with DOIs
Pro Tip

Use our manuscript template to ensure correct formatting from the start. Download from the Author Resources page.

Scope Check

Manuscripts outside our scope are returned within 48 hours — check our Aims & Scope page before submitting.

02

Editorial Desk Check

The editorial office reviews your manuscript for scope relevance, completeness, and formatting compliance within 3–5 business days.

3–5 business days
What We Check
  • Alignment with journal scope
  • Completeness of submission files
  • Formatting compliance
  • Ethics declarations present
03

Peer Review Assignment

Manuscripts passing the desk check are assigned to a handling editor who invites a minimum of two independent peer reviewers.

5-7 days to assign
Our Reviewer Pool
  • 500+ active domain experts worldwide
  • Strict conflict-of-interest screening
  • At least 5 reviewers per manuscript
  • Double-blind process guaranteed
Blind Review

Author and reviewer identities remain confidential throughout the entire review process.

Timeline

Reviewers have 21 days to complete their assessment. We send reminders at day 14 and day 18 to ensure timely feedback.

04

Double-Blind Peer Review Process

Reviewers evaluate the manuscript on scientific rigor, novelty, methodology, and clarity under a strict double-blind process.

2-9 weeks
Evaluation Criteria
  • Scientific originality & novelty
  • Methodology appropriateness
  • Data quality & interpretation
  • Clarity and presentation
05

Author Revision

Authors receive a consolidated decision letter with reviewer comments. Major revisions are typically due within 60 days.

14–60 days
Decision Types
  • Accept — minor or no changes needed
  • Major Revision — significant revisions required
  • Minor Revision — small corrections needed
  • Reject — does not meet criteria
Revision Support

Authors may request a 30-day extension for major revisions. Contact the editorial office with justification.

Online First

Accepted articles appear as Online First within 7–14 days, fully citable with DOI before print issue assignment.

06

Publication

Accepted manuscripts are copy-edited and typeset. Articles appear online within 7–14 days of final acceptance.

7–14 days post-acceptance
After Acceptance
  • Professional copyediting & typesetting
  • Proof sent to corresponding author
  • Published open access with CC-BY licence
  • Indexed in major databases within 30 days
02
Manuscript Preparation

Author Guidelines

All manuscripts must comply with the following guidelines before submission. Non-compliant manuscripts may be returned to authors without peer review.

A

File Format & Length

  • Submit main manuscript as .docx (Word) or .tex (LaTeX)
  • Research Articles: max 8,000 words (excl. references)
  • Reviews: max 10,000 words; Short Comms: max 3,500 words
  • Figures must be submitted as separate high-res files (300 dpi min)
B

Reference Style

  • APA 7th Edition for all in-text citations and reference list
  • DOIs required for all references where available
  • References must be numbered consecutively in order of appearance
  • Maximum 60 references for Research Articles; 120 for Reviews
C

Figures & Tables

  • Maximum 8 display items per Research Article
  • All figures must be readable at single-column width
  • Tables must be editable text, not images
  • Figure legends must be self-contained and placed after references
D

Authorship

  • All authors must meet ICMJE criteria for authorship
  • CRediT author contribution statements required
  • Corresponding author must be clearly designated
  • Changes to authorship after submission require editor approval
E

Abstract & Keywords

  • Structured abstract required: Background, Methods, Results, Conclusions
  • Research Articles: 250 words; Reviews: 300 words
  • 3-5 keywords using MeSH terminology where applicable
  • No citations permitted in the abstract

Manuscript Structure

10 Sections
Section Description Status
Title PageTitle, all author names, affiliations, ORCID IDs, corresponding author contactRequired
AbstractStructured abstract (Background / Methods / Results / Conclusions), 250 words maxRequired
Keywords3-5 keywords, preferably MeSH terms, placed below abstractRequired
IntroductionBackground, literature context, and clear statement of study aimsRequired
MethodsSufficient detail for reproducibility; include ethics statements and statistical approachRequired
ResultsData presented objectively without interpretation; figures and tables referenced hereRequired
DiscussionInterpretation, comparison with existing literature, limitations, future directionsRequired
DeclarationsEthics approval, competing interests, funding, author contributions, AI disclosureRequired
ReferencesAPA 7th Ed., numbered consecutively, DOIs included where availableRequired
SupplementaryAdditional data, methods, or figures uploaded as a separate fileOptional
03
Pre-Submission

Submission Preparation Checklist

Use this checklist to verify your manuscript is ready. Items marked Mandatory must be completed — missing items will result in desk rejection.

04
Peer Review

For Reviewers

We depend on the expertise and time of volunteer peer reviewers worldwide. We are committed to making the review experience as clear, efficient, and rewarding as possible.

Join Our Reviewer Community

Become a Reviewer

We are continuously seeking domain experts to join our reviewer database. Serving as a reviewer offers CPD recognition and acknowledgement in our annual Reviewer Honour Roll.

Register as Reviewer

Review Scope

Reviewers are asked to assess manuscripts strictly within their declared area of expertise. Conflicts of interest must be declared immediately upon receiving an invitation.

Timeline & Commitment

Standard review deadline is 21 days from acceptance. Extensions of up to 7 days may be requested. Reviewers who cannot complete on time should decline promptly.

Confidentiality

All manuscripts under review are strictly confidential. Reviewers must not share, discuss, or use manuscript content before publication.

How to Respond

Reviewer invitations are sent via email. Accept or decline within 5 days. If declining, please suggest alternate reviewers when possible.

Recognition

All reviewers who complete reviews are acknowledged annually in our Reviewer Honour Roll. Outstanding reviewers are awarded the Distinguished Reviewer Award each year.

Resources & Training

New reviewers are encouraged to complete peer review training. We also provide a structured Review Report Template to guide first-time and experienced reviewers alike.

Review Evaluation Criteria
Scientific Originality
High
Methodology
High
Data Quality
High
Interpretation
Medium
Literature Context
Medium
Clarity & Presentation
Low
Ethics Compliance
Mandatory

For each criterion, reviewers assess: Is the research question novel? Are methods appropriate, reproducible, and sufficiently described? Are data presented clearly? Are conclusions justified by the data? Is the manuscript appropriately situated within existing literature? Is the manuscript clearly written and logically structured? Are all required ethics statements included?

Reviewer Ethics & COPE Guidelines
Review only manuscripts within your genuine area of expertise
Declare any potential conflict of interest before reviewing
Maintain strict confidentiality of manuscript content
Provide constructive, unbiased, and respectful feedback
Do not use AI tools to process or summarise submitted manuscripts
Complete the review within the agreed timeframe or notify editors promptly
Do not contact authors directly without editor permission
Adhere to COPE Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers